|
Fsck downtime estimates: msg#00089file-systems.lustre.user
Hello, some questions for CFS people:
I am just fresh from a workshop where one whole day was dedicated to
file systems and Lustre was one of the key solutions. There was one
person attending this workshop who was asking every speaker to
comment on the fsck downtime for each of the file systems discussed,
and we looked at Lustre from this point of view, as well.
In case of Lustre, this downtime is estimated as 1-3 hours for 1 TB of ext3
in use on OST (depending on the underlying hardware), and may last of up
to several days per 1 PB for the metadata part.
Could someone from CFS suggest a sort of formula to calculate the fsck
downtime in a more accurate manner? This is often important when
planning for service levels. If a file system is spread over multiple OSTs,
which fsck operations run in parallel? May metadata checking be
parallelized?
Thanks ahead - Andrei.
Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss-KYPl3Ael/zSakBO8gow8eQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Exporting a lustre FS via NFS: 00089, Alexey Lyashkov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Fsck downtime estimates: 00089, Andreas Dilger |
| Previous by Thread: | Exporting a lustre FS via NFSi: 00089, Roger Sersted |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Fsck downtime estimates: 00089, Andreas Dilger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |