|
Re: Max obtainable performance for a single OST - THANKS!: msg#00040file-systems.lustre.user
On 4/14/07, Andreas Dilger adilger-KYPl3Ael/zSakBO8gow8eQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Nathaniel Rutman nathan-KYPl3Ael/zSakBO8gow8eQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Use "lfs setstripe 0 0 3" for directory for ost[0,1,2], "lfs setstripe 0 3 3"
> for directory for ost[3,4,5], etc. > You can use 'lfs setstripe' to designate a starting OST index, for a
> file or a directory. With that, you could set up different single-OSS > directories. Thanks, this helps! In this way any file will indeed be confined to exactly one OSS
while will be able to make use the combined power of three internal OSTs.
> If you have more than a single client reading from an OSS at the same
> time, you don't even need to do that -- use three OSTs per OSS, with > everything single-striped. Your multiple clients can use the different > OSTs simultaneously, increasing your total performance. True, but in this way the peak performance per file will be that of only one OST,
which is only 300+ MB/sec in our case. Whereas with 3 OSTs striped we may
be able to obtain between 750 and 900+ MB/sec per file. Thanks again for clarifying this issue - Andrei. Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss-KYPl3Ael/zSakBO8gow8eQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | lctl ping fails to/from the client: 00040, Scott Atchley |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Max obtainable performance for a single OST - THANKS!: 00040, Brian J. Murrell |
| Previous by Thread: | lctl ping fails to/from the clienti: 00040, Scott Atchley |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Max obtainable performance for a single OST - THANKS!: 00040, Brian J. Murrell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |