|
Re: subsystem_debug and mem_used in proc: msg#00013file-systems.lustre.user
On Apr 04, 2007 11:28 -0800, Jan H. Julian wrote: > Could someone please clarify the use of the proc values for > subsystem_debug and memused. In regard to > /proc/sys/portals/subsystem_debug and /proc/sys/portals/debug, should > both be set to zero to totally turn of debugging? > > In regard to /proc/sys/lustre/memused we see quite a variety of > entries included many with negative values. Does the negative value > have a particular meaning? > For instance "cat /proc/sys/lustre/memused" for 9 nodes shows: > ... > mg07 102186899 > mg08 101775995 > mg09 -1323553489 > mg10 -1328553965 > mg11 -1378379739 > mg12 -1347059989 > mg13 -1364717487 > mg14 -1358477913 > mg15 24680370 > > These are 16 core machines with 64GB of resident memory. This appears to be an overflow of a 32-bit counter. It isn't strictly harmful, because it will underflow an equal amount later on and should return to zero when Lustre unmounts. It does make this stat less useful on machines with lots of RAM. Are these client or server nodes? I'm a bit surprised that Lustre would be allocating > 2GB of RAM. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Principal Software Engineer Cluster File Systems, Inc. |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | subsystem_debug and mem_used in proc: 00013, Jan H. Julian |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Cookies not random?: 00013, John R. Dunning |
| Previous by Thread: | subsystem_debug and mem_used in proci: 00013, Jan H. Julian |
| Next by Thread: | Re: subsystem_debug and mem_used in proc: 00013, Jan H. Julian |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |