|
Re: Why we need delayed allocation!: msg#00050file-systems.ext2.devel
On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 12:43:30PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote: > drops to 4MB/s because of the fragmentation). There is a 2.6 heuristic > to colour the allocations based on pid, but that wouldn't help Lustre > (or NFS or Samba) where the pid of the service thread is randomly chosen > from a pool for each RPC. Please leave samba out of that list since it does use one fixed pid for each user & host. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Why we need delayed allocation!: 00050, Arjan van de Ven |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Bachelor's Diploma, Master's, or PhD - No Classes Necessary...curry: 00050, Tracie Hastings |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Why we need delayed allocation!i: 00050, Andreas Dilger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Why we need delayed allocation!: 00050, Arjan van de Ven |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |