|
Re: Why we need delayed allocation!: msg#00044file-systems.ext2.devel
I should add that the other place where this becomes critical is if we support extents, since using seven discontinuous regions for a 9 block file makes extents extremely inefficient. But Alex does have that support in an alpha form in his extent patches, so this is a definitely a good thing.... - Ted ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Why we need delayed allocation!: 00044, Theodore Ts'o |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Why we need delayed allocation!: 00044, Andreas Dilger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Why we need delayed allocation!i: 00044, Theodore Ts'o |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Why we need delayed allocation!: 00044, Andreas Dilger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |