Re: wpa_supplicant craps out under heavy load

On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 14:06 -0700, Paul wrote:
> Justin P. Mattock wrote:
> > <snip>
> >   
> > I would file a bug, but there probably already is, since this is
> > something I've seen for some time now right!
> >
> > Justin P. Mattock
> >
> >   
> Just do it!
> 
> 8^D
> 
> It's worth it, to make sure it gets looked at, whether it's a problem 
> with the wpa implementation, NetworkManager or both. I am guessing both, 
> as NM sucks more than Windows ME, and you have a smaller problem without 
> NM than with, but still a problem regardless. No reports is worse than 
> two reports, and 50 would point out the importance of getting this 
> particular bug fixed.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> Paul
> 
> 

O.K. I just registered(now waiting for
confirmation thing to be received)
In the meantime, on my other system LFS
I have wicd setup, seems less complicated
as NEtworkManager and reliable.
(but don't get me wrong I do enjoy NetworkManager).

In this case this isn't probably NetworkManager's fault
but wpa_supplicant doing something with the key exchange.

(Anyways waiting for their response).

Justin P. Mattock

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines