Subject: orphaning (eol) gtk-qt-engine - msg#01109

Previous Message by Date: (click to view message preview)

Re: Major reorganization of TeX Live packages

On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 10:31 -0400, Neal Becker wrote: > On F11 I get: > > kpathsea-2007-42.fc11.x86_64 from installed has depsolving problems > --> Missing Dependency: texlive = 2007-42.fc11 is needed by package > kpathsea-2007-42.fc11.x86_64 (installed) > Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2007-42.fc11 is needed by package > kpathsea-2007-42.fc11.x86_64 (installed) > First, you need to enable enable the updates-testing repository. Then, you need to wait until the new kpathsea package hits the updates-testing repository: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/texlive-2007-46.fc11 Or, you can fetch the new build of kpathsea manually from http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=137909 -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussilehtola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Next Message by Date: click to view message preview

Re: Packaging Survey - May 2009

Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 10/23/2009 09:19 AM, Gerry Reno wrote: Did eucalyptus ever get packaged for F12 ? I didn't find anything in rawhide today when I checked it. Nobody volunteered yet. Rahul I see on the eucalyptus site that they now have rpms available for CentOS 5.3. Maybe that would make it easier now to create packages for Fedora. http://open.eucalyptus.com/downloads -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Previous Message by Thread: click to view message preview

Action Tags concept for Fedora PkgDB

Hi, I am working on online application database which is becoming part of Fedora PkgDB. Online Application Database was separate project called Amber in the past, but as there had been similar features developed in the Fedora PkgDB, we decided to merge our efforts. In Amber definition there is suggested different concept of apps organization. I like the rasoning there and would like to implement it in pkgdb. I'd like to know your opinion on this. In Online Application Database definition, there are defined two primary use cases I am trying to address: 1/ I want to do 'X' with my computer. Where 'X' might be quite complex task like 'Import videos from my camera and put them on YouTube' 2/ I can already do 'X' with my computer, but maybe I can do it better with different software. There are also some suggestions how to achieve this there. For more information look at Amber definition - https://fedorahosted.org/amber/wiki/Definition. I followed some of the suggestions and this is how I would like to implement it in Fedora PkgDB: Task ----- - Task is container that will allow us to break complex task into more 'atomic' parts. This should allow us to create toolsets needed for completition of complex tasks. - Task consits of one or more Actions. - Actions shall be added by creating new Action or by choosing from the list of the existing ones. - Task shall be defined by pkgdb users . Example: Task: Import videos from my camera and put them on YouTube Actions: [Capture video, Edit video, Encode video, Upload video to YouTube] Action -------- - Action is atomic task - Action shall be defined by PkgDB user either as part of Task definition process or as standalone entity. - Actions should be used instead of current tags. (I believe replacing current tags would help to avoid confusion from two kinds of tags.) Application tagging ----------------------- There is not much difference against current tagging system. Users shall be tempted to input verbs instead of nouns: "I use this application to ________________ and give it ***** stars." Input box shall feature AJAX search for existing actions to reduce duplication. User ratings (http://mbacovsk.fedorapeople.org/Amber/mockups/Fedora_app_page.png) shall be updated accordingly. Note: I am thinking of keeping categories imported from .desktop file as read only information Search --------- Both Tasks and Actions shall be included among other targets for search (app names, descriptions, comments, etc) Does it make sense? Do you think it would be acceptable/ understandable for common users?. Any comments and ideas will be appreciated. Regards, Martin -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Next Message by Thread: click to view message preview

Re: orphaning (eol) gtk-qt-engine

Rex Dieter wrote: > For F-12+, my plan is to allow the new kcm-gtk package > to... provide a systemsettings/kcm module to configure > gtk theming When will it be available, even as a testing rpm? I looked in koji and it is not there and yum knows nothing about it. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list