|
Re: [ISN] Oh Dan Geer, where art thou?: msg#00277encryption.general
Ellen Messmer, in Network World, writes of Dan Geer: Whatever happens, don't expect this loose cannon of the Internet to go So -- If those who raise obvious questions are "loose cannon," what then are the technologists who agreed with the report but chose not to sign? Victims? Pragmatists? Mercenaries? One hopes Ms. Messmer didn't really mean what she wrote... Will --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: why "penny black" etc. are not very useful: 00277, Ben Laurie |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: why "penny black" etc. are not very useful: 00277, Arnold G. Reinhold |
| Previous by Thread: | [ISN] Oh Dan Geer, where art thou?i: 00277, R. A. Hettinga |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [ISN] Oh Dan Geer, where art thou?: 00277, Anish |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |