|
Re: [camram-spam] Re: Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postage: msg#00262encryption.general
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Eric S. Johansson wrote: > But using your spam size, , the slowdown factor becomes roughly > 73 times. So they would need 73 machines running full tilt all the time > to regain their old throughput. Believe me, the professionals have enough 0wned machines that this is trivial. On the flipside, it means the machines are "burned" faster. > unfortunately, I think you making some assumptions that are not fully > warranted. I will try to do some research and figure out the number of > machines compromised. The best No. I had seen to date was about 350,000. It's at least an order of magnitude higher than this, possibly 2 orders, thanks to rampaging worms with spamware installation payloads compromising cablemodem- and adsl- connected Windows machines worldwide. AB --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [camram-spam] Re: Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postage project: 00262, Eric S. Johansson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Difference between TCPA-Hardware and a smart card (was: example: secure computing kernel needed): 00262, Jerrold Leichter |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [camram-spam] Re: Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postage projecti: 00262, Eric S. Johansson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [camram-spam] Re: Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postage project: 00262, Jerrold Leichter |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |