|
Re: Difference between TCPA-Hardware and a smart card (was: example: secure: msg#00253encryption.general
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Seth David Schoen wrote: >When attestation is used, it likely will be passed in a service like >HTTP, but in a documented way (for example, using a protocol based on >XML-RPC). There isn't really any security benefit obtained by hiding >the content of the attestation _from the party providing it_! It's not the parties who are interested in security alone we're worried about. There is an advantage in profiling and market research, so I expect anyone able to effectively subvert the protocols to attempt to hide the content of remote attestataion. Bear --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Repudiating non-repudiation: 00253, robin benson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: I don't know PAIN...: 00253, Jerrold Leichter |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Difference between TCPA-Hardware and a smart card (was: example: secure computing kernel needed)i: 00253, Seth David Schoen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: hiding attestation from the consumer: 00253, John Gilmore |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |