|
Re: Non-repudiation (was RE: The PAIN mnemonic): msg#00200encryption.general
At 11:18 AM 12/23/2003 +0200, Amir Herzberg wrote: Any alternative definition or concept to cover what protocol designers usually refer to as non-repudiation specifications? For example non-repudiation of origin, i.e. the ability of recipient to convince a third party that a message was sent (to him) by a particular sender (at certain time)? there is some reference in old posting in pkix thread: http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm11.htm#14 Meaning of Non-repudation possibly more than you want to know ... but merged security taxonomy and glossary ... sources at: http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/index.html#glosnote has definitions for: non-repudiation non-repudiation exchange non-repudiation information non-repudiation of creation non-repudiation of delivery non-repudiation of knowledge non-repudiation of origin non-repudiation of receipt non-repudiation of sending non-repudiation of submission non-repudiation of transport non-repudiation policy non-repudiation service non-repudiation token plus: NRD token NRO token NRS token NRT token -- Anne & Lynn Wheeler http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/ Internet trivia 20th anv http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Ousourced Trust (was Re: Difference between TCPA-Hardware and a smart card and something else before: 00200, Anne & Lynn Wheeler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Ousourced Trust (was Re: Difference between TCPA-Hardware and a smart card and something else before: 00200, Rich Salz |
| Previous by Thread: | CIA - the cryptographer's intelligent aid?i: 00200, Ian Grigg |
| Next by Thread: | Re: example: secure computing kernel needed: 00200, bear |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |