|
RE: Difference between TCPA-Hardware and a smart card (was: example: secure: msg#00188encryption.general
From: "Carl Ellison" <cme@xxxxxxx> > Some TPM-machines will be owned by people who decide to do what I > suggested: install a personal firewall that prevents remote attestation. How confident are you this will be possible ? Why do you think the remote attestation traffic won't be passed in a widespread service like HTTP - or even be steganographic ? -- ############################################################## # Antonomasia ant notatla.org.uk # # See http://www.notatla.org.uk/ # ############################################################## --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Non-repudiation (was RE: The PAIN mnemonic): 00188, Stefan Kelm |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Ousourced Trust (was Re: Difference between TCPA-Hardware and a smart card and something else before: 00188, Anne & Lynn Wheeler |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Difference between TCPA-Hardware and a smart card (was: example: secure computing kernel needed)i: 00188, Ben Laurie |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Difference between TCPA-Hardware and a smart card (was: example: secure computing kernel needed): 00188, Seth David Schoen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |