|
|
October 24, 2002
- Re: comparing RMAC to AES+CBC-MAC or XCBC (Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?), Adam Back
- Re: collision resistance -- Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?, Ed Gerck
- Re: collision resistance -- Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?, David Wagner
- collision resistance -- Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?, Ed Gerck
- Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?, Ed Gerck
- Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?, Ed Gerck
- STORK CRYPTOGRAPHY WORKSHOP: preliminary program, Antoon Bosselaers
- Re: comparing RMAC to AES+CBC-MAC or XCBC (Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?), Sidney Markowitz
- Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?, David Wagner
- Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?, Ed Gerck
- Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?, Ed Gerck
- Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?, David Wagner
- Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?, Wei Dai
- Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?, Ed Gerck
October 22, 2002
- Re: comparing RMAC to AES+CBC-MAC or XCBC (Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?), Sidney Markowitz
- Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?, Greg Rose
- Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?, Sidney Markowitz
- Re: Palladium -- trivially weak in hw but "secure in software"?? (Re: palladium presentation - anyone going?), Tal Garfinkel
- Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?, Ed Gerck
- comparing RMAC to AES+CBC-MAC or XCBC (Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?), Adam Back
- Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?, Ed Gerck
- Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?, Sidney Markowitz
- Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?, Wei Dai
- Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?, Ed Gerck
- Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?, Sidney Markowitz
- Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?, Ed Gerck
- Re: Palladium -- trivially weak in hw but "secure in software"?? (Re: palladium presentation - anyone going?), Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?, Victor.Duchovni
- Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?, Ed Gerck
- Re: Palladium -- trivially weak in hw but "secure in software"?? (Re: palladium presentation - anyone going?), alan
- Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?, Wei Dai
- Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?, Ed Gerck
- Re: Palladium -- trivially weak in hw but "secure in software"?? (Re: palladium presentation - anyone going?), Rick Wash
- Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?, Sidney Markowitz
- Re: Palladium -- trivially weak in hw but "secure in software"?? (Re: palladium presentation - anyone going?), alan
- Re: Palladium -- trivially weak in hw but "secure in software"?? (Re: palladium presentation - anyone going?), Nelson Minar
- Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?, bear
- Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?, Ed Gerck
- Palladium -- trivially weak in hw but "secure in software"?? (Re: palladium presentation - anyone going?), Adam Back
- Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?, Victor.Duchovni
- Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?, Aram Perez
- Re: Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?, Adam Back
- Why is RMAC resistant to birthday attacks?, Victor.Duchovni
- Re: palladium presentation - anyone going?, Arnold G. Reinhold
October 16, 2002
- [IP] Former FBI chief takes on encryption, Perry E. Metzger
- Re: [Bruce Schneier <schneier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>] CRYPTO-GRAM, October 15, 2002, Sidney Markowitz
- Re: [Bruce Schneier <schneier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>] CRYPTO-GRAM, October 15, 2002, Pete Chown
- RE: [Bruce Schneier <schneier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>] CRYPTO-GRAM, Octo ber 15, 2002, Dean, James
- Re: [Bruce Schneier <schneier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>] CRYPTO-GRAM, October 15, 2002, Greg Rose
- Re: [Bruce Schneier <schneier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>] CRYPTO-GRAM, October 15, 2002, Bill Frantz
- [Bruce Schneier <schneier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>] CRYPTO-GRAM, October 15, 2002, Perry E. Metzger
- Crypto in court Friday, Russell Nelson
October 15, 2002
- Re: Microsoft marries RSA Security to Windows, Ed Gerck
- Re: Microsoft marries RSA Security to Windows, Arnold G. Reinhold
- Digital Identity Forum programme, R. A. Hettinga
- Input requested for second edition of "Firewalls and Internet Security", Steve Bellovin
- Re: open source CAs?, Joris Ballet
- Re: Microsoft marries RSA Security to Windows, bear
- Re: Microsoft marries RSA Security to Windows, Ed Gerck
- Re: Microsoft marries RSA Security to Windows, Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: open source CAs?, Stefan Kelm
- US DOD Crypto related SBIRS, reusch
October 10, 2002
- CFP -- IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, Steve Bellovin
- Re: open source CAs?, Henrik Andreasson
- Re: Microsoft marries RSA Security to Windows, Ed Gerck
- Re: open source CAs?, Derek Atkins
- RE: open source CAs?, Graeme . Burnett
- Re: Microsoft marries RSA Security to Windows, Dan Riley
- Re: Microsoft marries RSA Security to Windows, Roy M. Silvernail
- Re: Microsoft marries RSA Security to Windows, Joseph Ashwood
- Re: open source CAs?, Michael H. Warfield
- Re: open source CAs?, Stefan Mink
- Re: open source CAs?, Leif Johansson
- Mitnick starts security company, R. A. Hettinga
- CFP: Security in Distributed Computing Special Track of PODC 2003, Amir Herzberg
October 03, 2002
- Re: Gaelic Code Talkers, John Kelsey
- Re: What email encryption is actually in use?, Jeremey Barrett
- RE: What email encryption is actually in use?, Udhay Shankar N
- Re: Gaelic Code Talkers, bear
- Re: What email encryption is actually in use?, bear
- [dgc.chat] New Release of NeuDist, R. A. Hettinga
- JYA ping, R. A. Hettinga
- Quantum cryptography takes to the skies, Udhay Shankar N
- RE: What email encryption is actually in use?, Lucky Green
- The 3rd Annual Consult Hyperion Digital Identity Forum, R. A. Hettinga
October 02, 2002
- Re: What email encryption is actually in use?, RL 'Bob' Morgan
- Re: What email encryption is actually in use?, Simon Josefsson
- Re: Optical analog computing?, David Honig
- Gaelic Code Talkers, Bill Frantz
- Re: What email encryption is actually in use?, Ben Laurie
- Re: What email encryption is actually in use?, Adam Shostack
- Re: Optical analog computing?, Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: What email encryption is actually in use?, Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: What email encryption is actually in use?, John Saylor
- Re: What email encryption is actually in use?, Paul Krumviede
- Re: What email encryption is actually in use?, Jeremey Barrett
- Re: Optical analog computing?, Greg Rose
- Re: What email encryption is actually in use?, Jeremey Barrett
- Re: What email encryption is actually in use?, Udhay Shankar N
- ECHELON news, Udhay Shankar N
- Re: What email encryption is actually in use?, Matthew Byng-Maddick
- Re: What email encryption is actually in use?, Jeremey Barrett
- VeriSign Sells CALEA-Ware to Arrival, Cellular Mobile Systems, and First Cellular, R. A. Hettinga
- Re: What email encryption is actually in use?, Bill Stewart
- Re: Optical analog computing?, John S. Denker
- Optical analog computing?, R. A. Hettinga
- Re: Real-world steganography, Bill Stewart
October 01, 2002
- Re: Real-world steganography, Sampo Syreeni
- Re: Real-world steganography, Ben Laurie
- Cryptome, Carsten Kuckuk
- Re: Real-world steganography, Bram Cohen
- Operation RoadDevil: Secret Service probes wireless networks in Washington, R. A. Hettinga
- Re: Real-world steganography, Paul Krumviede
- Re: Real-world steganography, Jeremey Barrett
- Re: Real-world steganography, Adam Shostack
- Re: Real-world steganography, Paul Krumviede
- Real-world steganography, Peter Gutmann
|
|