|
Re: A testing for KVM: msg#00632emulators.kvm.devel
Dong, Eddie wrote: > Yes. but I am wondering about the performance. Hypercall to get > host time should be expansive than hardware support TSC read which is > about 200 cycles. I may make mistake since I didn't go through the patch > in very detail. > > gettimeofday is very important :-) > Maybe we should have a guest-visible tsc offset that can be used to extrapolate the last clock read using the tsc. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/_______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 0/5] KVM paravirt_ops backend (v3): 00632, Li, Xin B |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: A testing for KVM: 00632, Gregory Haskins |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: A testing for KVMi: 00632, Dong, Eddie |
| Next by Thread: | Re: A testing for KVM: 00632, Gregory Haskins |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |