|
Re: [patch] wrong tlb flush order: msg#00626emulators.kvm.devel
Li, Xin B wrote: >> BTW, >> >> The current VMX code does not make sense to me: >> >> static void vmx_flush_tlb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >> { >> vmcs_writel(GUEST_CR3, vmcs_readl(GUEST_CR3)); >> } >> >> > > The point is, vmexits will invalidate all TLB entries on Intel VT > processor today. > Yes. This was based on some text in the manual that I can't find anymore. I long suspected that it is unnecessary. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 5/5] KVM: paravirt time source: 00626, Dong, Eddie |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: A testing for KVM: 00626, Avi Kivity |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch] wrong tlb flush orderi: 00626, Li, Xin B |
| Next by Thread: | SLES 10 install failing on KVM-28: 00626, M.J. Rutter |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |