|
Re: [RFT] Fix for unhandled msr c0000081 problems under Intel cpus: msg#00287emulators.kvm.devel
* Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >actually, those MSRs are really architecture-defined for P6 family > >CPUs. So KVM/qemu should at least fake something there, or ignore it. > >These MSRs might be ticked by various existing kernels and > >distributions. Performance counters are ignored at the moment? > > They are unimplemented, and tricky to implement. Just swallowing the > wrmsr is easy, but it won't do the expected thing, whatever that is. the expected thing is to get periodic watchdog NMIs injected - but it's not a big problem if that doesnt work, the watchdog code detects that. Crashing during bootup isnt too sexy though. Ingo ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFT] Fix for unhandled msr c0000081 problems under Intel cpus: 00287, Avi Kivity |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 0/8] KVM updates for 2.6.20-rc2: 00287, Ingo Molnar |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFT] Fix for unhandled msr c0000081 problems under Intel cpusi: 00287, Avi Kivity |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFT] Fix for unhandled msr c0000081 problems under Intel cpus: 00287, Avi Kivity |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |