|
Re: [RFT] Fix for unhandled msr c0000081 problems under Intel cpus: msg#00281emulators.kvm.devel
Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >>> that did the trick. The only messages remaining are: >>> >>> kvm: unhandled wrmsr: 0xc1 >>> inject_general_protection: rip 0xc011b8ae >>> >>> >>> >> That's a performance counter. What guest triggers it? >> > > a 32-bit Linux bzImage: > > c011b8ae: 0f 30 wrmsr > > (gdb) list *0xc011b8ae > 0xc011b8ae is in setup_apic_nmi_watchdog (include/asm/msr.h:36). > 31 static inline void wrmsrl (unsigned long msr, unsigned long long val) > 32 { > 33 unsigned long lo, hi; > 34 lo = (unsigned long) val; > 35 hi = val >> 32; > 36 wrmsr (msr, lo, hi); > 37 } > 38 > 39 /* wrmsr with exception handling */ > 40 #define wrmsr_safe(msr,a,b) ({ int ret__; > > > the guest also obviously crashes due to this #GPF. > The wary ones use wrmsr_safe(). > [ 2.6.20-rc2-rt2 kernel of course ;-) ] > > Who's the caller? I boot 2.6.18 variants regularly and they don't touch that msr. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFT] Fix for unhandled msr c0000081 problems under Intel cpus: 00281, Ingo Molnar |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 0/8] KVM updates for 2.6.20-rc2: 00281, Ingo Molnar |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFT] Fix for unhandled msr c0000081 problems under Intel cpusi: 00281, Ingo Molnar |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFT] Fix for unhandled msr c0000081 problems under Intel cpus: 00281, Ingo Molnar |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |