Re: Re: Peter still in misery (was: Jan doesn't want Peter to know (was: Peter wants

On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 01:34:05 -0500, Peter D. Ward wrote:
>The road you've taken leaves open trade secret questions
>such as:
>
>1)  In developing Herc, has a developer ever consulted licensed source
>code to benefit the internals of Herc?
>2)  In developing Herc, has a developer ever consulted accessed licensed
>internal code to the benefit of Herc testing and development?
>3)   In developing Herc, has a developer ever received the benefit of
>licensed materials as passed on from others?
>4)   In developing Herc, has a developer ever benefited from testing
>running licensed OS's on unlicensed platforms?

Guys, these are THE important questions. If either of the developers 
(including in a very minor way myself) would/should answer yes to
one of these, AND if IBM were to be "dissatisfied" with the Hercules idea,
then yes, the project could have a problem.  
Please note all the conditionals in the above, though. 

/Per



regards,
Per Jessen, Zurich
http://www.enidan.com - home of the J1 serial console.

Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped.



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get 128 Bit SSL Encryption!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/JjlUgA/vN2EAA/kG8FAA/dpFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
hercules-advocacy-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/