Re: Re: Peter still in misery (was: Jan doesn't want Peter to know (was: Peter wants

pa3efu wrote:

>  Let me start with that I do not believe that my opinion is really
> relevant in this matter,

Why not relevant -- would you act no differently than now if it was your
opinion that Hercules incorporates patented technology?


> but
> I do not think that either of them apply for a number of reasons, the
> first patent you quoted
> is named "Process using virtual addressing in a non-privileged
> instruction to control the copying of a page of data in or between
> multiple media",
> our mvpg implementation does not have multiple storage media

Did you even bother to read past the title?  The FIRST SENTENCE says "A
single non-privileged instruction copies a page of data from a source
virtual address in an electronic medium to a destination virtual address
**** in the same **** or in a different electronic storage medium"
(emphasis added)    In light of that, do you still think its does not
apply?

>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get 128 Bit SSL Encryption!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/JjlUgA/vN2EAA/kG8FAA/dpFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
hercules-advocacy-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/