logo       

Re: Why are the FUD spreaders spreading FUD?: msg#00017

emulators.hercules390.advocacy

Subject: Re: Why are the FUD spreaders spreading FUD?

> I feel certain there *must* be more licensing options available
than
> are widely-known. In fact, I've challenged Phil Payne on this
before,
> and I'll challenge him (or anyone else) again: I've heard the
> acronyms bandied about (GOLC, MLC, ESL, all the rest)... Phil you
> speak this language, I don't; I can't believe there isn't a
> relatively cheap license out there for demonstration purposes...

Well, no. There isn't. The question is - what do you want to
demonstrate? If you're selling a product you've developed for
zSeries, you will qualify for PWD under the terms of that effort so
there's no issue.

The major problem area (as I see it) with PWD is education - a lot of
small trainers would like to carry around small zSeries systems and a
batch of laptops. A few Cat5 jumper cables, a small Ethernet switch
and you have a portable zSeries classroom with its own controlled
environment - workshop education without having to load examples and
case studies onto the corporate system.

The current limitation on fractional GOLC is 1GHz. This is a problem
because such machines are becoming scarce in new supply. Licensing
needs to be revisited in this space.




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise