|
Re: Why are the FUD spreaders spreading FUD?: msg#00017emulators.hercules390.advocacy
> I feel certain there *must* be more licensing options available than > are widely-known. In fact, I've challenged Phil Payne on this before, > and I'll challenge him (or anyone else) again: I've heard the > acronyms bandied about (GOLC, MLC, ESL, all the rest)... Phil you > speak this language, I don't; I can't believe there isn't a > relatively cheap license out there for demonstration purposes... Well, no. There isn't. The question is - what do you want to demonstrate? If you're selling a product you've developed for zSeries, you will qualify for PWD under the terms of that effort so there's no issue. The major problem area (as I see it) with PWD is education - a lot of small trainers would like to carry around small zSeries systems and a batch of laptops. A few Cat5 jumper cables, a small Ethernet switch and you have a portable zSeries classroom with its own controlled environment - workshop education without having to load examples and case studies onto the corporate system. The current limitation on fractional GOLC is 1GHz. This is a problem because such machines are becoming scarce in new supply. Licensing needs to be revisited in this space. |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Why are the FUD spreaders spreading FUD?: 00017, commanonce |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Why are the FUD spreaders spreading FUD?: 00017, edamjr |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Why are the FUD spreaders spreading FUD?i: 00017, edamjr |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Why are the FUD spreaders spreading FUD?: 00017, edamjr |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |