|
[emacs-w3m:04550] Re: Call for info writers: msg#00042emacs.w3m
> I also wanted to say: when you explain the meaning of a key in a @table > @kbd, don't forget to include in the description the name of the > function which the key calls, so that people can find information about > it. Like: > > @table @kbd > @item s > @kindex s > @findex w3m-history > Display the list of URLs visited in this session. If called with a > prefix argument, show the list of arrived URLs instead > (@code{w3m-history}). > @end table > > I fixed all the descriptions in my current texi file, the modifications > will be in my next patch. Do you mean we should put a function name to its table item's body? or just only we should put it to @findex? Masatake |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | [emacs-w3m:04549] Re: Forward: Bug#177243: w3m-el: cookies broken for Australian XEmacs users: 00042, TSUCHIYA Masatoshi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [emacs-w3m:04551] Re: Call for info writers: 00042, Masatake YAMATO |
| Previous by Thread: | [emacs-w3m:04546] Re: Call for info writersi: 00042, Romain FRANCOISE |
| Next by Thread: | [emacs-w3m:04552] Re: Call for info writers: 00042, Romain FRANCOISE |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |