logo       

[emacs-w3m:04513] Re: Call for info writers: msg#00005

emacs.w3m

Subject: [emacs-w3m:04513] Re: Call for info writers

> Masatake YAMATO <jet@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > I've written both key binds(DEL and >) and command
> > names(w3m-scroll-down-or-previous-url, w3m-scroll-left). In such case,
> > should I write M-x as a prefix for the command names or not?
>
> If the command is bound to a key, there is no need to give the M-x
> <function> in the key bindings, this is useful only if there are no key
> bindings for the command.

I'd like to write M-x <function> explicitly for info-like-map user.

We have written about key bindings based on only lynx-like-map. I
think if writing also M-x <function>, info-like-map user can do M-x
where-is easily to find where the function is bound-to in
info-like-map.

This is just another ugly notation?

Masatake YAMATO




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise