|
[emacs-w3m:04513] Re: Call for info writers: msg#00005emacs.w3m
> Masatake YAMATO <jet@xxxxxxxx> writes: > > > I've written both key binds(DEL and >) and command > > names(w3m-scroll-down-or-previous-url, w3m-scroll-left). In such case, > > should I write M-x as a prefix for the command names or not? > > If the command is bound to a key, there is no need to give the M-x > <function> in the key bindings, this is useful only if there are no key > bindings for the command. I'd like to write M-x <function> explicitly for info-like-map user. We have written about key bindings based on only lynx-like-map. I think if writing also M-x <function>, info-like-map user can do M-x where-is easily to find where the function is bound-to in info-like-map. This is just another ugly notation? Masatake YAMATO |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | [emacs-w3m:04512] Re: Call for info writers: 00005, Katsumi Yamaoka |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [emacs-w3m:04514] Re: Call for info writers: 00005, Masatake YAMATO |
| Previous by Thread: | [emacs-w3m:04511] Re: Call for info writersi: 00005, Romain FRANCOISE |
| Next by Thread: | [emacs-w3m:04516] Re: Call for info writers: 00005, Romain FRANCOISE |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |