Florent Georges wrote:
> > In general, JavaScript sucks, not just SGML parser legacy
> > still used for HTML. In practice, if you want JavaScript
> > with XHTML, use comments and not that great XML escaping.
> Please, don't. Comments can be thrown away by the XML
> parser. Tools that use comments to store data are a plea.
Mmh. Sounds a little bit peremptory, sorry. But AFAIK CDATA is
known to work in the browsers/SGML world, isn't it? While commenting
will not always work in the XML world.
If it's the case, as I think, why still use commenting now?
Regards,
--drkm
___________________________________________________________________________
Nouveau : téléphonez moins cher avec Yahoo! Messenger ! Découvez les tarifs
exceptionnels pour appeler la France et l'international.
Téléchargez sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/emacs-nxml-mode/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
emacs-nxml-mode-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
