Norman Walsh writes:
Hi
> If you write a grammar with multiple namespaces, it'll work just fine.
> And it's easy to import grammars so if you want RSS+x+y+z it shouldn't
> be too hard to construct a grammar for that.
So if I want to use X+Y+Z, I have to write a specific grammar
explicitly importing all these three sub-grammars, is it right?
And I'll have to do this for each combination of grammars, right?
If it is, it could be nice to have a mechanism to say "for the
namespace X, use the file X.rnc, etc."
Because you say nXML can already use multiple namespaces in the
same grammar, it could be easy to nXML to build itself the
resulting grammar by combining multiple sub-grammars, isn't it?
--drkm
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/A77XvD/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/2U_rlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/emacs-nxml-mode/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
emacs-nxml-mode-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
