|
Re: filtering output from compile: msg#00933emacs.help
kai.grossjohann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Kai Großjohann) writes: > "Theepa Somasundaram" <theepa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> I have a Make file which contains a line like, >> gdb dummy.exe >> I run the make file from Emacs in compile mode. I would like Emacs >> not to send the command to the shell and instead to execute the >> debugger within Emacs, as if I had started the debugger with a >> shotcut key. > > It is not possible for make to talk back to Emacs to do stuff. So > you will have to circumvent make. > > I suggest you try M-x gdb RET. I forgot to mention that it might be possible to change the command line. M-x gdb RET offers you to type a command. You could try typing "make frumple" there, if frumple is the target that invokes the debugger in the end. But this might fail because M-x gdb RET does some magic with the command line that you type. Investigate the function gud-gdb-massage-args for the gory details. -- Ambibibentists unite! |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Skeleton & Abbrev: 00933, Kai Großjohann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: filtering output to the *compilation* buffer: 00933, Kai Großjohann |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: filtering output from compilei: 00933, Kai Großjohann |
| Next by Thread: | A question about mail setting in xemacs0: 00933, Kim, Sung-youn |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |