Re: possible bug in bbdb-search-simple: gnus, spam-split and bbdb

>>>>> "Ted" == Ted Zlatanov <tzz@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

    Ted> On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, oub@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
    >> >> (bbdb-search-simple nil who)

    Ted> I tried to duplicate your bug but could not.2

    Ted> I added "Maria.Pons@xxxxxxxxxxxx" to a BBDB entry.

    Ted> Then     I   called    M-:    (bbdb-search-simple    nil
    Ted> "Maria.Pons@xxxxxxxxxxxx") and it brought up the correct
    Ted> entry.

    Ted> I  repeated with  "maria.pons@xxxxxxxxxxxx" in  the BBDB
    Ted> and again the search for Maria.Pons@xxxxxxxxxxxx worked.

    Ted> This seems to  be what you are reporting,  so maybe  you have
    Ted> something set up   differently.  First of   all, is  my  test
    Ted> correct?  Second,  are you running  the latest  BBDB?  Third,
    Ted> does the test fail for you?

Hi, 



    -  I am running no gnus 0.3 (snapshot) and bbdb-2.35

    - I switch the address  to be checked  to be my own, that  is
      easier  for testing,  so  I  tried
      (bbdb-search-simple nil "oub@xxxxxxxxxx")
      and the it turned correctly the entry

    -  I did it again with
    (bbdb-search-simple nil "OUB@xxxxxxxxxx")
      and the it turned correctly the entry.
So far so good.

So I tried edebug-defun on spam-check-BBDB (I have not much
experience with this). So I send myself a couple of messages from
OUB@xxxxxxxxxxx
I use the simplify setting
(setq
                 nnimap-split-rule  'nnimap-split-fancy 
                 nnimap-split-inbox "INBOX" 
                 nnimap-split-fancy  '(|
                                                           (: spam-split)
                                                           "MAILBOX"))

(setq spam-use-BBDB-exclusive  t)
(setq spam-use-BBDB t)

And indeed these messages end up in SPAM.

So when running the debugger, first everything goes smoothly, who
is correctly identified with  "OUB@xxxxxxxxxx"
the problem start in the line
                     (intern-soft who bbdb-cache) there for some reason
nil is returned!!!


Could you do a simple test? Send yourself messages from 
<TZZ@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 

And see whether with the above splitting it ends up in SPAM.

I will continue with the testing and would appreciate any help on
the edebug utility anyway.

Thanks

Uwe 



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
bbdb-info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info
BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/