|
Re: possible bug in bbdb-search-simple: gnus, spam-split and bbdb: msg#00005emacs.bbdb.user
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, oub@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > That is > > Maria.Pons@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > Will not be recognised, by the bbdb based splitting method (however > when applying bbdb/gnus-show-sender the address is correctly > associated with the bbdb entry) , even if I put it explicitly in the > bbdb database like this > > Net: Maria.Pons@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > But > > maria.pons@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > Will be recognised either with > Net: Maria.Pons@xxxxxxxxxxxx > or > Net: maria.pons@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > I discussed this with Ted Zlatanov, who actually maintains spam.el of > gnus and he told me that the bbdb based splitting method uses > > (bbdb-search-simple nil who) > > (Bbdb/gnus-show-sender seem not to use this function.) > > Now can the bbdb code changed such that the search is more > intelligent. Either that, or someone tell me what I'm doing wrong in the spam.el code :) Thanks Ted ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ bbdb-info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: possible bug in bbdb-search-simple: gnus, spam-split and bbdb: 00005, Ronan Waide |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: possible bug in bbdb-search-simple: gnus, spam-split and bbdb: 00005, Uwe Brauer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: possible bug in bbdb-search-simple: gnus, spam-split and bbdbi: 00005, Uwe Brauer |
| Next by Thread: | problem with bbdb-update-records: 00005, rpgoldman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |