Re: 1.2.3 qa whilst going production

David Everly wrote:

> If you still need to have 970 distinctly and individually searchable,
>
> be certain that bib1.att,  usmarc.abs,  usmarc.tag,  Emilda MARC
> configuration (database), and your CCL_names array (MARC.inc) is
> appropriately harmonized.
>
> In either case, if you want it to display, you still have to manage
> the Emilda MARC Configuration.
everything configured ok and working fine - believe me.

even worse, i heavily use sucessfully
   "local_catalog_data_x" => "u=6000 t=l t=r t=n t=b s=al",
:-)