Christoffer Landtman wrote:
> This, as in point 2. above, I cannot reproduce. In my environment the
records stay intact, even though I add another copy within the local
database. Is this the case with all Your biblios, or ony with some? I
have noticed that especially LOC in many cases has very little
information about biblios, which might be the cause of the problem. When
You add the other copy, which is found locally, does the book_add page
show author/title/etc during the representation of the hit? If it does
not, my best guess would be that the information never got into the
database in the first place. the "View MARC"-function has been
implemented explicitly for tracking this sort of behaviour, and should
also help in this case.
Could You please verify before and after edit, with the "View
MARC"-function, and tell me if it really does skip fields not defined.
If it does, could You please supply some book that this happends with,
so that I could try to reproduce the issue.
Yes, this is indeed how I noticed that the fields were disappearing.
However it may have something to do with my version of yaz/zebra or even
with some of the small changes I made to play around with adding the
subject entry to MARC (here I am complaining about a bug that may be
mine... :-) ). In either case I was able to see that the bugs are indeed
not present on your online demo page.
I'm going to hold off on moving my data over to Emilda until the planned
1.2-unstable release since I'd like to see how you handle classification
and the xml stuff so that I don't double up on the migration work! I'll
actually be away for most of the holidays, but keep an eye out for me on
the mailing list in January!
Chris
|
