|
proficiency versus achievement testing: msg#00146education.english.teflchina.general
Whether you test for proficiency versus achievement may depend on your purpose for testing. If you are teaching a class, and you need to give a grade to the students on whether or not they have learned what you have taught them, it might be fairer to test on what you have taught, not on general proficiency. One example might be when I took modern Greek. I was one of only two non-heritage learners of modern Greek in the class. Everyone else in the class had been exposed to modern Greek on some level or other at home or at church or on summer vacations in Greece. Many of them were taking the class because they had a language requirement, and because they needed/wanted to learn to read and write in Greek. When the teacher came into the class a few minutes early, she would often talk Greek with the students. Especially in the first and second quarters, I understood NOTHING. Other students were able to carry on a conversation with her. However, when she talked to me using the vocabulary I had been exposed to in our book, and which I had had a chance to learn, I did fine. I could write better than any of the Greek-Americans except for the student who was planning to become a Greek Orthodox priest (the only Greek American who was doing any serious studying for the class). If the teacher had given me a grade based on my proficiency relative to that of other students, on topics not covered in class, I would have gotten quite a low grade. By testing us by using vocabulary and on topics that we had been exposed to, I could get an A. I worked various parts of my anatomy off in that class, and would have been very upset if I had been given a grade based on my ability to use and understand vocabulary that I had never had a chance to learn. In a low-level listening-speaking class, I will often give out a very long list of questions based on the topics we have covered over the course of the term. I explain that I will ask questions randomly off the list (this is done in a corner, individually, while other students are involved in group work - I tape record it so that I can review it later). I explain that students who cover just the bare minimum get a C. Students who can add more information, especially if they can ask me questions back and understand when I respond, can expect higher grades. Is this grade going to be an accurate measure of how the students will be able to function in an all-English environment? Of course not. Is it a fair way to determine part of the oral production grade for a particular class? I think it is. Karen ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ _o_ ~ c(___)/` U http://wikigogy.org our wiki TEFLChina Rules & Help: http://wikigogy.org/TEFLChina |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Student Directed: 00146, Nelson Bank |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: oral assessment: 00146, Merton Bland |
| Previous by Thread: | Student Directedi: 00146, Nelson Bank |
| Next by Thread: | Re: proficiency versus achievement testing: 00146, elizabeth tripp |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |