logo       

proficiency versus achievement testing: msg#00146

education.english.teflchina.general

Subject: proficiency versus achievement testing

Whether you test for proficiency versus achievement may depend on
your purpose for testing.

If you are teaching a class, and you need to give a grade to the
students on whether or not they have learned what you have taught
them, it might be fairer to test on what you have taught, not on
general proficiency.

One example might be when I took modern Greek. I was one of only two
non-heritage learners of modern Greek in the class. Everyone else in
the class had been exposed to modern Greek on some level or other at
home or at church or on summer vacations in Greece. Many of them
were taking the class because they had a language requirement, and
because they needed/wanted to learn to read and write in Greek.

When the teacher came into the class a few minutes early, she would
often talk Greek with the students. Especially in the first and
second quarters, I understood NOTHING. Other students were able to
carry on a conversation with her.

However, when she talked to me using the vocabulary I had been
exposed to in our book, and which I had had a chance to learn, I did
fine. I could write better than any of the Greek-Americans except
for the student who was planning to become a Greek Orthodox priest
(the only Greek American who was doing any serious studying for the
class).

If the teacher had given me a grade based on my proficiency relative
to that of other students, on topics not covered in class, I would
have gotten quite a low grade. By testing us by using vocabulary and
on topics that we had been exposed to, I could get an A.

I worked various parts of my anatomy off in that class, and would
have been very upset if I had been given a grade based on my ability
to use and understand vocabulary that I had never had a chance to
learn.

In a low-level listening-speaking class, I will often give out a very
long list of questions based on the topics we have covered over the
course of the term. I explain that I will ask questions randomly off
the list (this is done in a corner, individually, while other
students are involved in group work - I tape record it so that I can
review it later). I explain that students who cover just the bare
minimum get a C. Students who can add more information, especially
if they can ask me questions back and understand when I respond, can
expect higher grades.

Is this grade going to be an accurate measure of how the students
will be able to function in an all-English environment? Of course
not. Is it a fair way to determine part of the oral production grade
for a particular class? I think it is.

Karen









^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
_o_ ~
c(___)/` U

http://wikigogy.org our wiki

TEFLChina Rules & Help: http://wikigogy.org/TEFLChina




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise