logo       

Re: Pronunciation (was Chinese learning English): msg#00078

education.english.teflchina.general

Subject: Re: Pronunciation (was Chinese learning English)

>From: Nelson Bank <natlunla-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>how you show the difference between voiced /th/ and
> >unvoiced /th/ and similar differences using >only
>"English" phonetics?
>
>You can use English phonemics with characters from the
>IPA. Otherwise you get into a Truspel situation that
>creates more confusion than it solves.

I don't know what the truespel confusion is. Please explain. No one in USA
uses the IPA to learning English that I know of. All I can vouch for is
that the truespel phoneme set is extablished, accurate, and mature.

Studies with k-1 native speakers learning English initially using a phonetic
systems such as "Writing to Read" in the mid 80's were successful. This
system is much like truespel but unfortunately with a few special symbols,
so not as keyboard friendly. Transition to tradspel was no problem.

For adult learners, after some practice on pronouncing each phoneme,
learners can read truespel text with minimal deviation from USA accent. The
next step is learning vocabulary and grammar - the hard part. Pronunciation
using truespel can be the easy part.

Truespel phonetic interpretation is modeled on talking dictionaries. It is
more accurate than other dictionary keys because it spells out all schwas,
which take many sounds. A recent test with a computer chip shows that
truespel renders a better spoken English than other phonetic methods tried
(this chip is still in development and info can't be released).

Tom Z







^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
_o_ ~
c(___)/` U

http://wikigogy.org our wiki

TEFLChina Rules & Help: http://wikigogy.org/TEFLChina




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise