|
|
Mozy Online Backup: 2GB Free. Automatic. Secure.
Subject: Re: grammar - msg#00108
List: education.english.teflchina.general
Graham wrote:
> There is a conundrum which foreign teachers need to take into
> account when dealing with the question of grammar in the Oral
> classes. The students will be examined on what they are taught by
> their Chinese teachers
AND
Dick Tibbets wrote:
> They often do but it is a grammar of written English not spoken and it
> is often an artificial construct not a grammar that is used by NS
> writers in English.
Conundrum or Old Chestnut - to what extent does the grading in an 'Oral
English' class by a FT carry weight regarding the student's overall academic
record? It is still my experience that it is very little, however I know some
of you, very few, have greater impact. Based on my experience, where or impact
lies is in the background preparation of students, who prove to be good enough,
to sit the Spoken component of CET, IELTS, and other language assessment tools.
Thus, an oral class should be focused on oral fluency hence the grammar of oral
communications, which differs somewhat to written English. Oral grammar is all
about the syntax of various speech acts as well as the structures that assist
and support the construction of intelligble conversational exchanges. This is
an area that, I believe, gets little or no planned development, beyond
intuitive corrections and analysis, in the English Oral Teaching arena of China.
Outside of Discourse Analysis, I don't know of any ESL Instructor programs that
delve into this in any detail. With respect to the teaching of written grammar
in the oral class, I feel it has no place, other than where both the oral and
written grammar closely coincide, such as in formal utterances, and forms of
address, introductions and salutations
A good book on Oral Grammar: Brazil, David. "A grammar of speech" 1995 OUP.
ISBN: 7-81046-586-4 H.596. Published in China by SFLEP. Cn Book number:
09-199-026. 18 RMB.
Regards,
Tsc Tempest DCA
__________________________
People's Republic of China
Zhuhai SEZ, Guang Dong
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Get to your groups with one click. Know instantly when new email arrives
http://us.click.yahoo.com/.7bhrC/MGxNAA/yQLSAA/IWOolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
TEFLChina Rules & Help ---> http://wikigogy.org/TEFLChina
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Was this page helpful?
Thread at a glance:
Previous Message by Date:
click to view message preview
Re: To teach grammar or not?
>
> Further to my previous posting - I was expressly instructed
not to spend classroom time on grammar, just encourage speaking.
So, I guess I'm not part of the "don't we all"!!
>
> Gail Schacter
>
I think another thing to consider is where the issuers of these
instructions are coming from (I just thought as I wrote this that the
present continuous here is being used for reasons far removed from
tense or aspect).
Many older Chinese learned spoken English through audiolingual or
situational methodology grafted on to their grammar translation
approach with written English. It was a process of repetition,
chanting even, and even the free practice once the utterance was well
learned was merely a matter of saying the prepared gobbet without a
direct prompt from the teacher.
In this situation the teacher doesn't need to teach grammar. The
teacher just gives model utterances and the students learn them as
such. There's some implicit grammar teaching with substitution drills
but it's so controlled it doesn't need explicit teaching.
If you are teaching oral English for genuine communication then you
cannot do it without grammar points arising and although you may not
be teaching by referring to rules, any correction on your part is
grammar based.
Dick Tibbetts
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Get to your groups with one click. Know instantly when new email arrives
http://us.click.yahoo.com/.7bhrC/MGxNAA/yQLSAA/IWOolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
TEFLChina Rules & Help ---> http://wikigogy.org/TEFLChina
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Next Message by Date:
click to view message preview
Re: grammar
--- Ria Smit <tryria-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I never taught grammar that was not used in the
> lesson, nor made lessons around grammar points.
> Oral English is to get them to talk and the Chinese
> teachers know a lot more grammar than I do.
>
And yet they usually don't speak so well, do they?
Chinese grammar teachers go rushing through the
grammar book teaching all kinds of complicated
grammar, explaining it all in Chinese, not English,
and at the end of the lesson the students can perhaps
do gap fill exercises but are very weak on correct
usage. Some of my sophomore students for example are
poor on the usage of the past simple. Their grammar
teachers didn't explain the uses, only the form, and
did little on it's application. That's where i think I
come in.
Russ Taylor
Russ
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Protect your PC from spy ware with award winning anti spy technology. It's free.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/97bhrC/LGxNAA/yQLSAA/IWOolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
TEFLChina Rules & Help ---> http://wikigogy.org/TEFLChina
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Previous Message by Thread:
click to view message preview
Re: learn Mandrin while teaching ESL..a no, no??
MODERATOR NOTE: This is a very informative post, but starts
to move from the pedagogy aspect of this list to a "life in China"
thread which is more appropriate on the TEFLChinaLIFE list. Could
people who want to respond to the non-pedagogy aspect either
post to TEFLChinaLife or directly to the original poster?
If you are responding directly on the classroom-oriented portions
of the post/thread, then by all means post to this list.
Thanks.
------------------------------------------------
Don wrote:
>If the American attempts to learn Mandarin, then,
> he/she will contaminate the spoken English ...
> I just wonder if anyone else has experiened this
> attitude or if I'm the one off base?
Great point Don!
When I first came here 6 years ago, my first school had a'no Chinese Language'
classes for foreign teachers policy. Their rationale was that if I learned
Chinese I "...would begin to use Chinese in class and the students would spend
more time on correcting your poor Chinese instead of learning English". Since
then I've worked in mostly "English Only" school environments or areas where
not speaking Chinese is not a disadvantage. As such my Chinese language skills
leave a lot to be desired.
Don wrote:
>Although Iv'e picked up over the
> years just enuff Chinese words to get me in trouble, I realize I will never
> get even Chinglish fluent with out more commitment than I'm willing
> to give.
May I suggest the excellent Pimsleur, "Mandarin for English Speakers" language
series for 'oral fluency'? I suggest you purchase the program (I did, all three
sets, still working through Vol 1) however, for the desperately needy it can be
downloaded via P2P networks on a lesson by lesson, ad hoc and randomly
accessible basis.
Don wrote:
> slant subjects to my learning Mandarin I would get ..."no, no Don,
> you must stay English." ... Why? I asked. "You will hurt your English"
> was the response. I was puzzled. ... The logic here:
>
> Americans are known to be only solo English fluent and that is
> exactly what the Chinese desire as teachers ... Besides ..."only
> Chinese have the ability to truly be fluent in Chinese and it's
> many dielects." ... I was frankly flabbergasted at this mentality
> ... They agreed that no laowai should ever become Mandarin fluent.
> They would admire "a little fluency" but beyond that.....No!
>
> Is national face and fluency at work here?
I think the answer you seek may lie in the following observations by Boye
Lafayette De Mente, who writes in, Chinese Etiquette & Ethics in Business, 2ed.
2004.
Although many cultured Chinese today may still regard Westerners as less
cultured and uncivilised in some ways, it would probably be accurate to say
that they now view foreigners as just different or alien. But there is the odd
exception to this general rule. In the countryside, some Chinese equate being
able to speak Chinese with being Chinese. Apparently this is because it is
impossible for them to conceive of someone's being able to speak Chinese and
without being Chinese - their foreign appearance notwithstanding.
At the same time, the Chinese mind-set is so exclusive that the racially
different foreigner can be born and rised in China, speak the language
perfectly, thnk and behave exactly like a Chinese, and yet not be accepted as
"belonging" in China, much less accepted as Chinese. The only Chinese is a Han
Chinese. The most a Westernenrcan hope for is to be acceptedas a "true friend"
of the Chnese. Because Westernerscan never "become" Chinese or achieve total
acceptance, they can never feel fully at home in China... [p56]
Being able to speak Chinese gives the foreigner a wonderful advantagein
China, but knowledge of Chinese psychology must go along with knowledge of the
language. Chinese-speaking foreigners must learn how to penetrate the
psychological block many Chinese have ... Most are so conditioned to the idea
that foreigners do not speak Chinese that when one does, they fail to
understand. The ear and the brain are simly not connected. [p88]
Don what are your Chinese-speaking ambitions? Just get by? oral/reading/writing
fluency to some particular level? conversational usage? business usage?
academic usage? instructional support? I guess it also depends on how long you
plan to stay in China too.
Having worked in compulsory English only teaching environments and others less
extreem I can say that knowing a few Chinese words has helped in-so-far as
progressing a lesson that has bogged down on less important points because
a/some students did not understand a particular 'noun' - it's an expedincy
thing. Having said that, I still would not recomend teachers to use Chinese in
class as a tool for moving a class along. Ditto with Language assistants!
Regards,
Tsc Tempest DCA
__________________________
People's Republic of China
Zhuhai SEZ, Guang Dong
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Everything you need is one click away. Make Yahoo! your home page now.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/AHchtC/4FxNAA/yQLSAA/IWOolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
TEFLChina Rules & Help ---> http://wikigogy.org/TEFLChina
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Next Message by Thread:
click to view message preview
dictionary overuse
Re: It is recommended that in order to promote learner autonomy,
teachers should raise students' awareness of the usefulness of a
dictionary and help them develop dictionary skills.
---
>This has been my latest "mission", and I start each class
>with asking how many of the ss's have a dictionary with them,
>which has upped the number considerably.
>Gail Schacter
In my opinion students use their dictionaries too much and
invariably select the wrong word. Recently one of my third year
English majors listed cantering as one of his hobbies when he
obviously meant jogging!
Nick
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Everything you need is one click away. Make Yahoo! your home page now.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/AHchtC/4FxNAA/yQLSAA/IWOolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
TEFLChina Rules & Help ---> http://wikigogy.org/TEFLChina
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|