|
|
Subject: Re: ancient allergies - msg#00056
List: education.classics
Thanks to H.A. Skinner, The Origin of Medical Terms (Williams and Wilkins,
Baltimore 1961) for the following information.
The word 'allergy' is an early 20th century coinage by Clemens von Pirquet
about 1903, first seen in print in Muench. Med. Wochenschr, 24 July 1906.
The phenomenon of hypersensitivity was recognised by physicians at least as
early as the Renaissance: Cardano (1501-76) took away a feather pillow and a
rose ball from the asthmatic Archbishop of St Andrews. Edward Jenner
(1749-1823), the discoverer of vaccination with cowpox, described allergy
and anaphylaxis, though without using those terms.
A widely held theory is that allergies including asthma are caused, or at
least encouraged, by an excessively hygienic upbringing, so that the child's
immune system is not challenged. Certainly the distribution of allergy in
the world today seems to support that -- and the historical examples do not
actually disprove it. If there is anything to the theory at all, it neatly
accounts for the low prevalence of such conditions in the ancient, and even
the medieval, world.
Ralph Hancock
Was this page helpful?
Thread at a glance:
Previous Message by Date:
click to view message preview
Re: ancient allergies
Do you mean if modern historians/scientists recognise the symptoms of
allergies in ancient folks? If so, yes--e.g. asthma, allergic eczema etc.
The notable figures include Augustus and Seneca.
At 03:38 PM 9/5/2004 -0400, you wrote:
Greetings,
As I finish off my third box of kleenex today (despite being on
prescription strength Reactin ... I think I'm in 'bounceback'), I
can't help but wonder whether any ancient types pondered what we
would call allergies. Anyone ever come across anything which might
be considered 'allergy' in the ancient world? I can't think of
anything in Pliny ...
regards,
dm
.................................................................
David Meadows dmeadows-AT-idirect-DOT-com
.................................................................
scholarly book reviews -- at rogueclassicism
http://www.atrium-media.com/rogueclassicism
.................................................................
Ling Ouyang
http://janusquirinus.org/
Next Message by Date:
click to view message preview
Re: ancient allergies
Greetings,
Actually, no ... I hadn't thought of that, but that's interesting too
(refs?). I was wondering whether ancient commentators/medical types
had a concept of illness akin to our 'allergy' model ...
regards,
dm
.................................................................
David Meadows dmeadows-AT-idirect-DOT-com
.................................................................
scholarly book reviews -- at rogueclassicism
http://www.atrium-media.com/rogueclassicism
.................................................................
On Sunday, September 5, 2004, multa scribuntur, inter alia:
LO> Do you mean if modern historians/scientists recognise the symptoms of
LO> allergies in ancient folks? If so, yes--e.g. asthma, allergic eczema etc.
LO> The notable figures include Augustus and Seneca.
LO> At 03:38 PM 9/5/2004 -0400, you wrote:
>>Greetings,
>>
>> As I finish off my third box of kleenex today (despite being on
>> prescription strength Reactin ... I think I'm in 'bounceback'), I
>> can't help but wonder whether any ancient types pondered what we
>> would call allergies. Anyone ever come across anything which might
>> be considered 'allergy' in the ancient world? I can't think of
>> anything in Pliny ...
>>
>>regards,
>>
>>dm
>>
>> .................................................................
>>David Meadows dmeadows-AT-idirect-DOT-com
>>.................................................................
>> scholarly book reviews -- at rogueclassicism
>> http://www.atrium-media.com/rogueclassicism
>>.................................................................
LO> Ling Ouyang
LO> http://janusquirinus.org/
Previous Message by Thread:
click to view message preview
Re: ancient allergies
At 01:04 PM 9/5/2004 -0700, you wrote:
I respond not as a classicist, but as one who has avoided allergies
through alternative medicine (probiotics). Chinese medicine does not
share the alergy paradigm, and generally alternative medical practices
reject it. Many of our "allergies" arise from overuse of antibiotics.
I'm guessing the whole allergy/athsma model is quite, quite modern. Of
course, it is now promoted for profit by the pharmacueticals.
I am not so sure. Just because something is not called by its modern name
or diagnosed as such does not mean it did not exist.
Linda G.
On Sunday, September 5, 2004, at 12:38 PM, David Meadows wrote:
Greetings,
As I finish off my third box of kleenex today (despite being on
prescription strength Reactin ... I think I'm in 'bounceback'), I
can't help but wonder whether any ancient types pondered what we
would call allergies. Anyone ever come across anything which might
be considered 'allergy' in the ancient world? I can't think of
anything in Pliny ...
regards,
dm
.................................................................
David Meadows dmeadows-AT-idirect-DOT-com
.................................................................
scholarly book reviews -- at rogueclassicism
http://www.atrium-media.com/rogueclassicism
.................................................................
Ling Ouyang
http://janusquirinus.org/
Next Message by Thread:
click to view message preview
Re: ancient allergies
Greetings,
But do we know there was a low prevalence in the ancient world? How
many anaphylactic reactions, e.g., to some food item or pollen or
whatever were interpreted as something else (maybe even poisoning?)??
regards,
dm
.................................................................
David Meadows dmeadows-AT-idirect-DOT-com
.................................................................
scholarly book reviews -- at rogueclassicism
http://www.atrium-media.com/rogueclassicism
.................................................................
On Sunday, September 5, 2004, multa scribuntur, inter alia:
RH> Thanks to H.A. Skinner, The Origin of Medical Terms (Williams and Wilkins,
RH> Baltimore 1961) for the following information.
RH> The word 'allergy' is an early 20th century coinage by Clemens von Pirquet
RH> about 1903, first seen in print in Muench. Med. Wochenschr, 24 July 1906.
RH> The phenomenon of hypersensitivity was recognised by physicians at least as
RH> early as the Renaissance: Cardano (1501-76) took away a feather pillow and a
RH> rose ball from the asthmatic Archbishop of St Andrews. Edward Jenner
RH> (1749-1823), the discoverer of vaccination with cowpox, described allergy
RH> and anaphylaxis, though without using those terms.
RH> A widely held theory is that allergies including asthma are caused, or at
RH> least encouraged, by an excessively hygienic upbringing, so that the child's
RH> immune system is not challenged. Certainly the distribution of allergy in
RH> the world today seems to support that -- and the historical examples do not
RH> actually disprove it. If there is anything to the theory at all, it neatly
RH> accounts for the low prevalence of such conditions in the ancient, and even
RH> the medieval, world.
RH> Ralph Hancock
|
|