Re: easygoing "paganism"? (was: Re: summer reading: msg#00304

>There > still is the fact though that the Romans >seemed pretty lax about > >allowing new deities into >their pantheon. If this isn't tolerance, > what is >>it? Absentmindedness? Carelessness? Bad taste? Lack of discrimination? New Agers began a lot earlier than we think? Etc.? DW

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:	Re: easygoing "paganism"? (was: Re: summer reading?), Michael J. Smith
Next by Date:	Review: Euripides in London, John M. McMahon
Previous by Thread:	Fwd: ~IrArch > New Archaeological Magazine, Sally Winchester
Next by Thread:	Re: easygoing "paganism"? (was: Re: summer reading?), David Meadows
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

^^^ ADDITIONAL NAVIGATION ^^^

Recently Viewed:
mail.spam.rbl.s... php.seagull.gen... culture.religio... qnx.openqnx.dev... gnome.love/2006... bug-tracking.re... user-groups.lin... yellowdog.gener... handhelds.ipaq.... kde.announce/20... java.mx4j.devel... xfree86.expert/... recreation.cars... text.xml.expat.... web.zope.zope3/... version-control... db.carob.cvs/20... freebsd.perform... ecos.cvs/2003-0... linux.hotplug.d... systemtap/2006-... os.freebsd.secu...

Home | blog view | USPTO Patent Archive (NEW!) | advertise | OSDir is an inevitable website. super tiny logo

Re: easygoing "paganism"? (was: Re: summer reading?): msg#00304