|
Re: Philip Pullman: msg#01127education.classics
DW wrote: My daughter is in an on-line group with Philip Pullman. She sent <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main.jhtml;$sessionid$H252S5UNZ1DMZQFIQMFSFFOAVCBQ0IV0?xml=/arts/2004/03/17/bodark17.xml> The Archbishop of Canterbury is not the only orthodox Christian admirer of the works; see the review at: http://www.firstthings.com/ftissues/ft0105/reviews/moloney.html which concludes with: Such a story is not subversive of Christianity, it is almost Christian, even if only implicitly and imperfectly. But implicit and imperfect Christianity is often our lot in life, and Pullman has unintentionally created a marvelous depiction of many of the human ideals Christians hold dear. (end quote) John -- *** John McChesney-Young ** panis@xxxxxxxxxxx ** Berkeley, California, U.S.A. *** |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: IACTA ALEA EST questions: 01127, James Butrica |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | nice coverage in the Cover Pages: 01127, Ross Scaife |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Philip Pullmani: 01127, David Meadows |
| Next by Thread: | TAN: Comet Bradfield: 01127, John M. McMahon |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |