|
Tribunicia potestate: msg#01123education.classics
I found this passage in Wikipedia [and have deleted it for now] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribune : As a result, there was never actually an "office" of emperor; emperors' reigns were dated by their assumption of ''tribunicia potestas'', and the actual constitutional position of the emperor was that of ''pontifex maximus'' (P.M.) ''tribunicia potestate'' (trib. pot.). I know it is not true that Tiberius' reign was dated by his assumption of tribunicia potestas [yikes! that would put the start of his reign a decade earlier] and so forth, but was it true in the late Empire? And "actual constitutional position" was that of ''pontifex maximus'' (P.M.) ''tribunicia potestate'' (trib. pot.)"? Ling Ouyang http://janusquirinus.org/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Don't do us any favors: 01123, Jack Kolb |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | martyrs redux: 01123, David Meadows |
| Previous by Thread: | TAN: Comet Bradfieldi: 01123, John M. McMahon |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Tribunicia potestate: 01123, Ling Ouyang |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |