|
Re: His Dark Materials (was Re: "Da Vinci" Debunking: msg#01114education.classics
John Lenz wrote: > Please. David Rivers, please read Luretius on infidels. Tolkien, > Lewis, et al. may be entertaining, even good literature, but that does > not make their mythologies useful in an argument about what is true & > what is infidel! Please read my posts! I happened to quote - lightheartedly - Dr. Samuel Johnson about the lasting power of what *he* called 'infidel' literature. I said nothing about the the truth of the mythologies of Tolkien, etc., and I said nothing about what is true and what is infidel. I said I that I enjoy Tolkien, etc. (although I am not a Christian) and that I think they will continue to be read for a long time. David __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Translation of "always remembered".: 01114, AllenAmet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: "Da Vinci" Debunking: 01114, Terrence Lockyer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: His Dark Materials (was Re: "Da Vinci" Debunkingi: 01114, John Lenz |
| Next by Thread: | Turning the Pages: 01114, John McMahon |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |