|
Re: "Da Vinci" Debunking: msg#01094education.classics
On Wednesday, April 28, 2004, David Lupher wrote : I gather it also presents a very skewed picture of : Greco-Roman paganism, offering it as a kind of : Never-Never-Land of woman-friendly, tree-hugging : values overthrown by the evil Constantine and his : goons. to which Bradley Skeen responded : How is this substanitally differnt from the view of antiquity : presented by Robert Graves, Maria Gimbutas, Carl Jung, : or Joseph Campbell? : : What it seems to that all of this stems from is a misundertanding : of the Romatic fantasy of a bucolic golden age (in Keats, Goethe, : etc. which served as an ideological basis for the criticism of the : enlightenment) confused with fact. and James Spinti added : Don't forget Mary Renault! I'm relying on imperfect memory here, but I'm assuming JS is referring to the narrative of religious and cultural change in Renault's Theseus novels (esp. *The King Must Die*). While there is no doubt that Renault writes of a "matriarchal" system in (gradually losing) conflict with a "patriarchal", I'd hardly describe her version of the former as one of "tree-hugging values"; indeed, quite the opposite. Terrence Lockyer Johannesburg, South Africa |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Forma Urbis Romae: 01094, John M. McMahon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Palaima receives award: 01094, Lora Holland |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: His Dark Materials (was Re: "Da Vinci" Debunkingi: 01094, Scott Carson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: "Da Vinci" Debunking: 01094, James Spinti |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |