|
Re: His Dark Materials (was Re: "Da Vinci" Debunking: msg#01086education.classics
At 02:40 PM 4/28/2004, David Rivers wrote: > Clever, but surely the Cathars had a much better idea (and actually existed That might be bad, it's true, but maybe they had views about the possibility of perfect contrition at the moment of death. I think if I belonged to such a group I would make *sure* that I had such a view. Another element of Cathar practice that I find congenial is the view that we really *ought* to live as hedonistically as possible all the time, at least until we are ready to repent of it all at the end, because if we try to live moral lives *all* the time we thereby fight against our natural impulses, and it is sinful to fight against what is in accordance with the natural law. It's a win-win situation! Scott Carson http://oak.cats.ohiou.edu/~carsond |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Intellectual Property and Classical Works: 01086, Patrick T Rourke |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Intellectual Property and Classical Works: 01086, Scott Vanderbilt |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: His Dark Materials (was Re: "Da Vinci" Debunkingi: 01086, David Rivers |
| Next by Thread: | Re: His Dark Materials (was Re: "Da Vinci" Debunking: 01086, John Lenz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |