|
Re: His Dark Materials (was Re: "Da Vinci" Debunking: msg#01079education.classics
"All infidel writers drop into oblivion, [snip] Ah yes, but this is the same literary prognosticator who famously declared, "Nothing odd will do long. 'Tristram Shandy' did not last." Also, whose writings (not conversations, I hasten to qualify) are more widely read today: those of Johnson or those of his infidel friend Gibbon (or, for that matter, his infidel bete noire Hume)? Also, who does not on occasion gratefully turn from Milton to Rochester? And hasn't Lucian lasted? (True, he's not as popular these days as he was in Johnson's...) David Lupher Classics Dept. Univ. of Puget Sound -- |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: His Dark Materials (was Re: "Da Vinci" Debunking: 01079, Yvonne Rathbone |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: His Dark Materials (was Re: "Da Vinci" Debunking: 01079, David Rivers |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: His Dark Materials (was Re: "Da Vinci" Debunkingi: 01079, Yvonne Rathbone |
| Next by Thread: | Re: His Dark Materials (was Re: "Da Vinci" Debunking: 01079, David Rivers |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |