|
Re: "Da Vinci" Debunking: msg#01029education.classics
"The Da Vinci Code" nearly caused me to burst a blood vessel. It is a DREADFUL book. The burden of its song is, more or less, as DL said: . I gather Over and over again, Brown suggests that pagan antiquity considered women sacred and thought that no man was whole or complete unless he got in touch with The Sacred Feminine through sexual intercourse; that before the Council of Nicaea, the Sacred Feminine controlled the excesses of male ego in "ancient cultures" until Constantine and those nasty Catholics ruined it all; that men in Egypt, Greece, and other parts of "antiquity" all reached Gnosis through the Hieros Gamos with a woman, etc. etc. The conflation of a multitude of different cultures into "the Ancients" drove me batty, as did statements like this (to take one example out of so many, so many): "Constantine and his male successors successfully converted the world from matriarchal paganism to patriarchal Christianity by waging a campaign of propaganda that demonized the sacred feminine, obliterating the goddess from modern religion forever.? (p. 124) And to top it all off, it's not even a good novel. It's shoddy, filled with characters who can hardly even be called cardboard, and extremely badly written--the man has no STYLE at all. And the supposedly brilliant main characters are annoyingly stupid. I kept shouting the solution of various clues at them for PAGES before they "got it"--I mean, two supposedly top-notch world-class cryptographers can't figure out simple anagrams right away? Come on ... The only good thing I have to say about the book is that it (and today's NYTimes article which DL has kindly brought to my attention) provided me with several "teachable moments" for the students who (shudder) liked the book. I'd try to elicit a posting from the list-member to whom I have Yeah, well ... EV Elizabeth Vandiver Distinguished Visiting Lecturer Department of Greek and Roman Studies Rhodes College Memphis, Tennessee 38112 _________________________________________________________________ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | "Da Vinci" Debunking: 01029, David Lupher |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: "Da Vinci" Debunking: 01029, Ralph Hancock |
| Previous by Thread: | On-line Homer in prcessi: 01029, Diana Wright |
| Next by Thread: | Re: "Da Vinci" Debunking: 01029, Harold Hungerford |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |