Subject: Re: (no subject) - msg#00216

Previous Message by Date: click to view message preview

Re: website

On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 03:31:49PM -0500, Joakim Ziegler wrote: > On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 16:15, Dave Malcolm wrote: > > On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 20:55, Dave Malcolm wrote: > > [snip] > > > > > > > Would people have a strong objection to me replacing the images of text > > > > in the navigation with actual text? > > > > I have a preference for this approach; it makes adding new pages much > > > easier. > > > Oops, that seems ambiguous... what I mean is: I'd prefer it if we just used > > actual text, rather than used images of text > > I definitely agree. I've been wanting to do this for some time, but I > haven't had the time. Looks like I have some more free time coming up, > though, I'd like to put together some tests of a new layout, also using > the new logo... Let me see what I can do in the coming week or so. > Okay! Means this also we will use the xml source for the website? Geert Stappers P.S. Discard my subjectless E-mail that should be titled "fresh new look".

Next Message by Date: click to view message preview

Re: fresh new look ( was no subject )

On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 03:51:14PM -0500, Joakim Ziegler wrote: > On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 15:40, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 08:55:30PM +0000, Dave Malcolm wrote: > > > > Also, at some point the website could really do with a fresh new look. > > > Is anyone out there good at CSS? > > > Mmmm, a fresh new look ... > > > > The design of http://www.conglomerate.org may look old, > > but I like the "different look" of the site. > > Anyway, if someone feels the itch go ahead. > > I'm going to try to take a look at it. Probably within the next week, > I'll have something. It's probably going to be some sort of natural > continuation of the current design. Great, the website design evolves also. > > > More important is how we can scale out the number of uploaders > > to the website. Joakim, how can we help you? > > Would it help if we send a private message > > when "conglomerate-web" has changed? > > Yes, I've said many times before that if you have patches for the > website that you are sure won't break stuff, you can just commit, and > send me a mail, and I'll update it. I'm almost always online, so it > won't be long, and it's very little work for me. Okay, I got that. > > > Something related: > > Can we continue with the XML approche for the website? > > That means dropping the PHP approche. > > That's a separate issue from changing the design, really. Someone here > on the list had an XSL based solution for that, I think, but I don't > remember what happened to it... That is in conglomerate-web as xsl/skin.xsl, the makefile is ready for it. >

Previous Message by Thread: click to view message preview

(no subject)

Bcc: Subject: fresh new look Reply-To: On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 08:55:30PM +0000, Dave Malcolm wrote: > > Also, at some point the website could really do with a fresh new look. > Is anyone out there good at CSS? > Mmmm, a fresh new look ... The design of http://www.conglomerate.org may look old, but I like the "different look" of the site. Anyway, if someone feels the itch go ahead. More important is how we can scale out the number of uploaders to the website. Joakim, how can we help you? Would it help if we send a private message when "conglomerate-web" has changed? Something related: Can we continue with the XML approche for the website? That means dropping the PHP approche. Geert Stappers

Next Message by Thread: click to view message preview

Re: fresh new look ( was no subject )

On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 03:51:14PM -0500, Joakim Ziegler wrote: > On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 15:40, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 08:55:30PM +0000, Dave Malcolm wrote: > > > > Also, at some point the website could really do with a fresh new look. > > > Is anyone out there good at CSS? > > > Mmmm, a fresh new look ... > > > > The design of http://www.conglomerate.org may look old, > > but I like the "different look" of the site. > > Anyway, if someone feels the itch go ahead. > > I'm going to try to take a look at it. Probably within the next week, > I'll have something. It's probably going to be some sort of natural > continuation of the current design. Great, the website design evolves also. > > > More important is how we can scale out the number of uploaders > > to the website. Joakim, how can we help you? > > Would it help if we send a private message > > when "conglomerate-web" has changed? > > Yes, I've said many times before that if you have patches for the > website that you are sure won't break stuff, you can just commit, and > send me a mail, and I'll update it. I'm almost always online, so it > won't be long, and it's very little work for me. Okay, I got that. > > > Something related: > > Can we continue with the XML approche for the website? > > That means dropping the PHP approche. > > That's a separate issue from changing the design, really. Someone here > on the list had an XSL based solution for that, I think, but I don't > remember what happened to it... That is in conglomerate-web as xsl/skin.xsl, the makefile is ready for it. >