Hi Deelan
> i'm new to the ML. I saw the mozillaZine's news about the europe
> conference, checked the slides and then subscribed to this dev ML. I'm
> basically interested in creating a WYSIWYG XML/XHTML editing tool for
> mozilla-based browsers. bitflux is definitely interesting, but
> from what i saw its pretty slow when it comes at GUI operations.
Did you do any benchmarking?
i think
> the built-in mozilla editor (composer) or the newly added midas module
> could be used instead of reinventing the wheel and write everything
> from scratch. why not personalize composer? or use midas?
no offense, but IMHO these are HTML editors? or have I missed something?
yes,
> this could "lock" the project to mozilla and make an eventual porting
> to IE even harder, but i think there're other module on the
> market to allow author content on IE, an eventual port could use
> those.
I think there is nothing on the market at the moment, which does it the same
way we do it, meaning xml, wysiwyg xml editing. And that's largely due to
Mozilla:)
>
> i'm looking at the midas demo and i think midas could be a solution.
> what it's not clear is how much midas there's in composer and vice
> versa. can midas be used to author XML files?
>
I don't think so.
Best
Roger
>
--
bx-editor-dev mailing list
bx-editor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.bitflux.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/bx-editor-dev
|
| 
