Hi
to sum up the whole stuff, MSIE is still on the TODO list for us, but
only in the longer term and presumably not until mozilla version is
"perfect" (except a customer pays us to do it, but that's a whole other
point :) )
But i had a nice chat with Bob Clary and he is very interested in
maintaining and updating his xb scripts, which provide cool
cross-browser stuff (But I'm still wondering if MS will someday provide
decent DOM2 support in their browsers..) and which shed some light on my
porting worries :)
And i'm also glad, we have no lemos on this list :)
chregu
On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 17:49, holger krekel wrote:
> [Sandro Zic Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 05:37:24PM +0200]
> > On Thursday 10 October 2002 14:44, Christian Stocker wrote:
> > > The problem is, as Brian mentioned, that ~94% is using MSIE and not
> > > everyone likes to install Mozilla or in general new software.
> >
> > True, but it's not those 94% who create their own content in a Web-based
> > CMS
> > application using BXE.
>
> That might be true or not <wink>. In fact it largely depends on the
> people using it and more factual data is needed to prove your point.
> I am myself using Konqueror/Linux by the way. But note that
> i *hope* you are right and CMS-managers don't insist on MS-IE.
>
> > If you want to prepare BXE to make it usable for the 94%, we should at
> > least
> > wait for 6 more months. Then BXE will hopefully behave like a "true"
> > WYSIWYG
> > editor. I don't say that because I think Christian is working too bad or
> > too
> > slow (rather, the opposit is true), but because it will simply take that
> > long, even if we only concentrate on BXE with Mozilla.
>
> Probably right.
>
> regards,
>
> holger
> --
> bx-editor-dev mailing list
> bx-editor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.bitflux.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/bx-editor-dev
--
bx-editor-dev mailing list
bx-editor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.bitflux.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/bx-editor-dev
|
| 
