Subject: Re: 10.5.1.1 released? - msg#00133

Previous Message by Date: click to view message preview

Re: Good, thin, ORM layer

I've used BeanKeeper (http://netmind.hu/persistence/index.php) and found it easy to work with. Chris Johnson On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Maggi Federico <federico.maggi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hello List, I love embedded stuff. I love SQLite and I love Derby even more. However, I was wandering, is there any good, thin, ORM layer which is entailed for small applications that use Derby? I found ActiveObjects pretty neat and I like the "conventions rather than configuration" philosophy. However, I think it's sometimes unstable though really promising. What would you suggest? Thanks in advance, ------------------------------------------------------------- Family photographs are a critical legacy for ourselves and our descendants. Protect that legacy with a digital backup and recovery plan.

Next Message by Date: click to view message preview

Re: Good, thin, ORM layer

Previous Message by Thread: click to view message preview

Re: 10.5.1.1 released?

Knut Anders Hatlen wrote: Matt Doran <matt.doran@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: Hi there, I noticed the 10.5.1.1 release listed on the page: http://db.apache.org/derby/ derby_downloads.html But didn't see any release announcement. Also, the link on that page doesn't work (returning an "internal server error"). http://db.apache.org/derby/releases/release-10.5.1.1.cgi Hi Matt, The release has been approved[1], but the official announcement won't be sent out until the bits are available from the Apache mirrors. This usually takes just a couple of days. [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-dev/200904.mbox/%3cc25576af0904282057n5182fcaci6aaa945d99a3be05@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx%3e Hi Knut, No problem :)   A little strange that the web site shows the release, and there's an "internal server error" when you follow the link. ;) Thanks, Matt