Re: Glibc for win32

On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:17:17PM +0200, Per Abrahamsen wrote:
>Christopher Faylor <cgf@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>There is 0% chance that a glibc-for-windows port would be accepted back
>>into the main glibc base so
>
>Why do you think so?

The glibc maintainers have no interest in enabling win32 as a platform.
That's one of the reasons for cygwin's existence.