logo       

Re: Taredemark vs copyright.: msg#00108

Subject: Re: Taredemark vs copyright.
Gilles Pelletier <gilpel-whniv8GeeGkdnm+yROfE0A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> A copyright is given to somebody -- an individual, a corporation, etc. -- for 
> work -- a song, a novel, a chemical process, an OS, etc. -- which is unique, 
> something that hasn't been done before, so that nobody can copy it during a 
> certain amount of time. 

If you had said "In some countries, a copyright is given to somebody [...]", 
I would even agree.

Cheers,
  Colin

-- 
I have made great efforts in ensuring correctness in the distributed
protocol. I have the coffee rings on my desk to prove it.
[Sunir Shah in http://www.jabber.org/?oid=1026]


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>