|
osdir.com mailing list archive |
|
Subject: Bug#293261: qa.debian.org: package bugs should also be against the package itself - msg#00071List: debian.devel.quality-assurance> Say you find a bug in a package what do you do? > > You check bugs.debian.org for that package (probably through > reportbug). > > If that list shows you that the package is orphaned or up for adoption > you, as DD actively using that package, are much more likely to take > it over or NMU fixes yourself instead of waiting half a year for > nothing to change on a bug. > > As non DD you might start looking for a maintained alternative instead > of clinging to something orphaned. > > Having the bug show up on the package's bug list as well as wnpp > doesn't hurt anyone and I would find it easier for people to see the > state of the package. I think you can use wnpp-alert (from devscripts package) to see which package you use is orphaned and its state [O] [RFA] Cheers -- Igor Genibel «Non bene pro toto libertas venditur auro» Freedom is not sold for all the gold in the world. Dubrovnik motto
Thread at a glance:
Previous Message by Date: click to view message previewBug#233748: marked as done (Wrong char - does not looks like OK)Your message dated Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:05:05 +0200 with message-id <200504281405.06383.igenibel@xxxxxxxxxx> and subject line This is fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Feb 2004 19:26:40 +0000 >From roxik@xxxxxxxxx Thu Feb 19 11:26:40 2004 Return-path: <roxik@xxxxxxxxx> Received: from eri.interia.pl [217.74.65.138] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Attom-0007sD-00; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 11:26:40 -0800 Received: from poczta.interia.pl (naos.interia.pl [217.74.65.50]) by eri.interia.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82050263F2 for <submit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:26:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (naos.interia.pl [127.0.0.1]) by system.wewnetrzny9 (poczta.interia.pl) with SMTP id 9DE37146C59 for <submit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:26:31 +0100 (CET) Received: by poczta.interia.pl (poczta.interia.pl, from userid 502) id 61C7D146CDA; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:26:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from win2000 (Wizard.gate.cd [195.128.112.2]) by poczta.fm (poczta.fm) with ESMTP id 07C7BAF58A for <submit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:26:30 +0100 (CET) To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Wrong char - does not looks like OK From: Roxik <roxik@xxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:26:33 +0100 Message-ID: <opr3mtmjy0z9yuwq@xxxxxxxxx> User-Agent: Opera7.23/Win32 M2 build 3227 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivered-To: submit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_18 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_18 X-Spam-Level: Package: qa.debian.org Version: unavailable; reported 2004-02-19 Severity: wishlist Hi.. Please visit for example to this website: http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/clamav-data.html and please click to maintaner first/last name. Following link:=20 http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=3Dmh+debian-packages@xxxxxxxxxxx= e (sorry Marc) :) qa does not correct accept '+' char. Please fix this error. This is=20 allowed char in MTA. -- I greet Roxik --------------------------------------- Received: (at 233748-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Apr 2005 12:05:12 +0000 >From igenibel@xxxxxxxxxx Thu Apr 28 05:05:12 2005 Return-path: <igenibel@xxxxxxxxxx> Received: from mx1.lost-oasis.net [212.85.153.8] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DR7lY-0006WL-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 05:05:12 -0700 Received: from atoulouse-201-2-1-120.w193-251.abo.wanadoo.fr ([193.251.11.120] helo=tass.osa-tlse.int) by mx1.lost-oasis.net with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_MD5:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1DR7ld-0003dA-H3; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:05:17 +0200 From: Igor Genibel <igenibel@xxxxxxxxxx> Organization: Debian GNU/Linux To: 233748-done@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, debian-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: This is fixed Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:05:05 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1170940.79q0EgxKcL"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200504281405.06383.igenibel@xxxxxxxxxx> Delivered-To: 233748-done@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --nextPart1170940.79q0EgxKcL Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, this bug is currently fixed either the PTS or qa.d.o/developer.php take=20 care of special characters Cheers =2D-=20 Igor Genibel =C2=ABNon bene pro toto libertas venditur auro=C2=BB =46reedom is not sold for all the gold in the world. Dubrovnik motto --nextPart1170940.79q0EgxKcL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCcNFy+xgdMBZI9sgRAmCpAJ4uNL46ipeR71AER8zty/xa6HFcIwCgt0Zo 6Bcrh//lD5Mx0CAi9eOj6wo= =Cy0b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1170940.79q0EgxKcL-- Next Message by Date: click to view message previewShould we just remove openwebmail?Hi, openwebmail is orphaned, but has only been so for 32 days. That said, it's got security issues, and hasn't been part of a stable release. So I'm personally inclined not to let it linger for a while on the grounds that it's got security issues, and just get it the hell out of the archive. It's not like Debian's short of webmail packages. That said, a non-DD has prepared an updated package as of a week ago, but no one has sponsored it yet. Just wondering what peoples' thoughts are? regards Andrew Previous Message by Thread: click to view message previewThis feature was addedHi, I added this feature in complement to the buildd column. Cheers -- Igor Genibel ÂNon bene pro toto libertas venditur auro Freedom is not sold for all the gold in the world. Dubrovnik motto pgpH7Z6Vv8Z9p.pgp Description: PGP signature Next Message by Thread: click to view message previewShould we just remove openwebmail?Hi, openwebmail is orphaned, but has only been so for 32 days. That said, it's got security issues, and hasn't been part of a stable release. So I'm personally inclined not to let it linger for a while on the grounds that it's got security issues, and just get it the hell out of the archive. It's not like Debian's short of webmail packages. That said, a non-DD has prepared an updated package as of a week ago, but no one has sponsored it yet. Just wondering what peoples' thoughts are? regards Andrew Loading Comments...
|
|
