Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocaml-doc non-free? - msg#00055

Previous Message by Date: click to view message preview

Re: [Caml-list] ocaml-doc non-free?

On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 10:54:45AM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote: > Package: ocaml-doc > Status: install ok installed > Priority: optional > Section: doc This is a local your problem, ocaml-doc is currently listed as non-free (section doc/non-free) in all debian boxes of mine and even in the packages search engine (see http://packages.debian.org/unstable/doc/ocaml-doc.html). Even "vrms" on my machines list it as a non-free package. Perhaps you have installed an old version? (IIRC sometimes ago ocaml-doc was created from the ocaml package and was in "doc" section ..., but I'm not sure). Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli - undergraduate student of CS @ Univ. Bologna, Italy zack@xxxxxxxxxxx | ICQ# 33538863 | http://www.cs.unibo.it/~zacchiro "I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!" -- G.Romney pgpKVrbii9B9k.pgp Description: PGP signature

Next Message by Date: click to view message preview

Re: [Caml-list] ocaml-doc non-free?

Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 10:54:45AM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote: >> Package: ocaml-doc >> Status: install ok installed >> Priority: optional >> Section: doc > > This is a local your problem, ocaml-doc is currently listed as non-free > (section doc/non-free) in all debian boxes of mine and even in the > packages search engine (see > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/doc/ocaml-doc.html). > > Even "vrms" on my machines list it as a non-free package. You are lucky :) > Perhaps you have installed an old version? (IIRC sometimes ago ocaml-doc > was created from the ocaml package and was in "doc" section ..., but I'm > not sure). No, as I said it is the latest version. I suspect something wrong in the overrides. -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ocaml-maint-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Previous Message by Thread: click to view message preview

Re: [Caml-list] ocaml-doc non-free?

jmarant@xxxxxxxxx (Jérôme Marant) writes: > Sven LUTHER <luther@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> What is vrms ? > > Virtual Richard Matthew Stallman. It is a program that lists all > the non-free packages in your system. > >> Anyway, much discution went into the move of ocaml-doc from main to >> non-free, you can look at the archives of >> debian-ocaml-maint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx to get an idea of some of them. > > It seems that the section of ocaml-doc is buggy: it should be > non-free/doc instead of doc. > > -=-=-=-=-=-= > > chinon:~$ dpkg -s ocaml-doc > Package: ocaml-doc > Status: install ok installed > Priority: optional > Section: doc > Installed-Size: 9212 > Maintainer: Vanicat Rémi <vanicat@xxxxxxxx> > Version: 3.06-1 > Suggests: ocaml > Description: Documentation for Objective Caml and Camlp4 > This package contains documentation for Objective Caml > in html, info, dvi, pdf, ps and plain text format as well as > documentation and a tutorial for Camlp4 in html, dvi and ps format. well the control file say : Source: ocaml-doc Section: non-free/doc Priority: optional Maintainer: Vanicat Rémi <vanicat@xxxxxxxxxx> Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>> 3.0.0) Standards-Version: 3.5.2 Package: ocaml-doc Architecture: all Suggests: ocaml Description: Documentation for Objective Caml and Camlp4 This package contains documentation for Objective Caml in html, info, dvi, pdf, ps and plain text format as well as documentation and a tutorial for Camlp4 in html, dvi and ps format. So, I don't understand ... -- Rémi Vanicat vanicat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://dept-info.labri.u-bordeaux.fr/~vanicat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ocaml-maint-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Next Message by Thread: click to view message preview

Re: [Caml-list] ocaml-doc non-free?

On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 10:54:45AM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote: > Package: ocaml-doc > Status: install ok installed > Priority: optional > Section: doc This is a local your problem, ocaml-doc is currently listed as non-free (section doc/non-free) in all debian boxes of mine and even in the packages search engine (see http://packages.debian.org/unstable/doc/ocaml-doc.html). Even "vrms" on my machines list it as a non-free package. Perhaps you have installed an old version? (IIRC sometimes ago ocaml-doc was created from the ocaml package and was in "doc" section ..., but I'm not sure). Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli - undergraduate student of CS @ Univ. Bologna, Italy zack@xxxxxxxxxxx | ICQ# 33538863 | http://www.cs.unibo.it/~zacchiro "I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!" -- G.Romney pgpKVrbii9B9k.pgp Description: PGP signature