|
|
May 29, 2002
- Re: GPLed software and OpenSSL, Jeff Licquia
- Re: GPLed software and OpenSSL, Simon Law
- Re: GPLed software and OpenSSL, Jeff Licquia
- Re: GPLed software and OpenSSL, Henning Makholm
- Re: GPLed software and OpenSSL, Simon Law
- Re: GPLed software and OpenSSL, Jeff Licquia
- Re: GPLed software and OpenSSL, Jeff Licquia
- Re: GPLed software and OpenSSL, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
- Re: GPLed software and OpenSSL, Steve Langasek
- Re: GPLed software and OpenSSL, Simon Law
- Re: GPLed software and OpenSSL, Jeff Licquia
- GPLed software and OpenSSL, Simon Law
May 24, 2002
- Re: [PATCH] License exception for OpenSSL (was Re: Linking Nessus with OpenSSL), Simon Law
- Re: [PATCH] License exception for OpenSSL, Walter Landry
- Re: [PATCH] License exception for OpenSSL (was Re: Linking Nessus with OpenSSL), Simon Law
- Re: [PATCH] License exception for OpenSSL (was Re: Linking Nessus with OpenSSL), Jeff Licquia
- Re: [PATCH] License exception for OpenSSL (was Re: Linking Nessus with OpenSSL), Renaud Deraison
- Re: [PATCH] License exception for OpenSSL (was Re: Linking Nessus with OpenSSL), Simon Law
- Re: Linking against OpenSSL, Stefan Schwandter
- Re: Bug#147430: hpoj: Linking against OpenSSL licensing modificat ion (GPL), Mark Purcell
- RE: Bug#147430: hpoj: Linking against OpenSSL licensing modificat ion (GPL), Jeff Licquia
- RE: Bug#147430: hpoj: Linking against OpenSSL licensing modificat ion (GPL), PASCHAL,DAVID (HP-Roseville,ex1)
May 17, 2002
- Re: Implied exceptions to GPL?, Walter Landry
- Re: Implied exceptions to GPL?, Peter S Galbraith
- Re: nomarch-1.2 - Problems with RLE patent 4,586,027, Matthew Grant
- Re: nomarch-1.2 - Problems with RLE patent 4,586,027, Matthew Grant
- Re: nomarch-1.2 - Problems with RLE patent 4,586,027, Daniel Burrows
- Re: nomarch-1.2 - Problems with RLE patent 4,586,027, Walter Landry
May 16, 2002
- nomarch-1.2 - Problems with RLE patent 4,586,027, Matthew Grant
- Re: sunset clauses, Mark Rafn
- Re: Implied exceptions to GPL?, Steve Langasek
- Re: OpenSSL exception for GPLed code?, Anthony Towns
- Re: Implied exceptions to GPL?, Henning Makholm
- Re: Implied exceptions to GPL?, Jeff Licquia
- Re: Implied exceptions to GPL?, Glenn Maynard
- Re: Implied exceptions to GPL?, Branden Robinson
- Re: Implied exceptions to GPL?, Jeff Licquia
- Re: Implied exceptions to GPL?, Brian May
- Re: Implied exceptions to GPL?, Branden Robinson
- Re: Linking Nessus with OpenSSL, Branden Robinson
- Re: sunset clauses, Branden Robinson
- Re: sunset clauses, Branden Robinson
- Implied exceptions to GPL?, Brian May
May 15, 2002
- Re: sunset clauses, Sam Hartman
- Linking Nessus with OpenSSL, Simon Law
- Re: sunset clauses, Mark Rafn
- Re: sunset clauses, Branden Robinson
- Re: sunset clauses, Branden Robinson
- seeking FDL 1.2 draft comment summary, Branden Robinson
- Re: sunset clauses, Sam Hartman
- Re: sunset clauses, Branden Robinson
- sunset clauses, Mark Rafn
- Re: CUPS, the GNU GPL, and dual-licensing, Michael Sweet
- Re: OpenSSL exception for GPLed code?, Branden Robinson
- Re: CUPS, the GNU GPL, and dual-licensing, Branden Robinson
- Re: Redistribution of JSSE in a java package, Sam Hartman
- Re: OpenSSL exception for GPLed code?, Sam Hartman
- Re: CUPS, the GNU GPL, and dual-licensing, Jeff Licquia
- Re: CUPS, the GNU GPL, and dual-licensing, Michael Sweet
- Re: Redistribution of JSSE in a java package, Rene Mayrhofer
- Re: Redistribution of JSSE in a java package, Stephen Stafford
- Re: OpenSSL exception for GPLed code?, Branden Robinson
- CUPS, the GNU GPL, and dual-licensing, Branden Robinson
- Re: Redistribution of JSSE in a java package, Henning Makholm
- Re: New CUPS license violates DFSG 6?, Henning Makholm
- OpenSSL exception for GPLed code?, Josip Rodin
- Re: New CUPS license violates DFSG 6?, Michael Sweet
- Re: New CUPS license violates DFSG 6?, Jeff Licquia
- Re: New CUPS license violates DFSG 6?, Sunnanvind Fenderson
- Redistribution of JSSE in a java package, Rene Mayrhofer
- beach towel, linda
- Re: New CUPS license violates DFSG 6?, Peter Makholm
- Re: New CUPS license violates DFSG 6?, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
- Re: New CUPS license violates DFSG 6?, Anthony DeRobertis
- Re: New CUPS license violates DFSG 6?, Sam Hartman
May 14, 2002
- Re: New CUPS license violates DFSG 6?, Glenn Maynard
- Re: New CUPS license violates DFSG 6?, Santiago Vila
- Re: New CUPS license violates DFSG 6?, Walter Landry
- Re: New CUPS license violates DFSG 6?, Glenn Maynard
- Re: New CUPS license violates DFSG 6?, Jeff Licquia
- Re: New CUPS license violates DFSG 6?, Mark Rafn
- Re: New CUPS license violates DFSG 6?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: New CUPS license violates DFSG 6?, Branden Robinson
- Re: New CUPS license violates DFSG 6?, Michael Sweet
- Re: New CUPS license violates DFSG 6?, Jeff Licquia
- Re: New CUPS license violates DFSG 6?, Peter S Galbraith
- Re: New CUPS license violates DFSG 6?, Sam Hartman
- Re: New CUPS license violates DFSG 6?, Henning Makholm
- Re: New CUPS license violates DFSG 6?, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
- Re: New CUPS license violates DFSG 6?, Wichert Akkerman
- Re: New CUPS license violates DFSG 6?, Peter Makholm
- New CUPS license violates DFSG 6?, Anthony DeRobertis
- Re: SPAM mails marking bugs as done?, Oliver Elphick
- Re: SPAM mails marking bugs as done?, Joseph Carter
- Help me, Kim chulmin
|
|